Posted by Bridgette
New Hampshire State Representatives
Challenge State Attorney General
on Election Fraud Investigation
Concord Flag
The Shot to be Heard Around the World!
NEWS RELEASE
January 3, 2012
Today concerned New Hampshire State Representatives delivered a signed affidavit to the State Attorney General Michael Delaney, stating that in 2009 Representative Larry Rappaport, Mr. Lucien Vita (now a State Representative), and Representative Carol Vita met with New Hampshire State Attorney General Michael Delaney and argued that they believed Barack Obama was not eligible to be President of the United States and requested that Attorney Delaney launch an investigation of Mr. Obama’s credentials. The three believed that the people of New Hampshire had been defrauded by Mr. Obama’s candidacy. The Attorney General stated it was a federal matter and refused to investigate.
We believe that according to the United States Constitution (Article ll section 1 paragraph 5)
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
A natural born Citizen, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in “Minor vs. Happersett”, Vattel’s “Law of Nations”, and the 2008 (S.Res. 511) Senatorial resolution, is one wherein both parents of whom were Citizens of the United States of America. According to the record, Mr. Obama’s father was born in Kenya. He never was a Citizen of the United States of America, making Mr. Obama ineligible to be a Presidential Candidate on the New Hampshire ballot.
Our attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. had previously delivered a written request to the Secretary Of State requesting him to review the challenge to Mr. Obama’s eligibility to be on the New Hampshire Ballot. The Ballot Law Commission met on November 18th to review our complaint. We were represented at that hearing by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. Our complaint was denied, but there appears to be an inconsistency in the process of the challenge.
According to the Assistant Secretary Of State, Karen Ladd, and the Ballot Law Commission, they testified that they can only rule on the Ballot Petition making sure it is filled out properly and is accompanied by a check for $ 1000.00. They claimed that it is not in their purview to determine if a person is a Natural Born Citizen. However, the inconsistency becomes obvious when the record shows that on November 15th. 2007 the Secretary of State’s office ruled that a Mr. Sal Mohamed was disqualified, and on July 19th. 2011 a Mr. Abdul K. Hassan Esq. was denied a place on the Presidential Ballot because they were not natural born citizens. Both letters were signed by Karen Ladd Assistant Secretary of State.
Despite what we consider overwhelming evidence, our attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was denied by the Ballot Law Commission, then was denied a rehearing, and filed an action before the New Hampshire Supreme Court where she was subsequently denied. We can provide copies of her challenges.
The oath we took when we were sworn in as legislators was to uphold and defend the Constitutions of both the United States and that of New Hampshire. We believe it is our duty as your Representatives to support the Constitution and to insure that anyone seeking the highest office in the land is qualified to be on the New Hampshire “First in the Nation” ballot.
Thank you….
* * * * * * * * * *
The affidavit:
GENERAL AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF_New Hampshire
COUNTY OF_Merrimack
PERSONALLY came and appeared before me, the undersigned Notary, the within named________________________________, who is a resident of ________________ County, State of ________________________, and makes this his/her statement and General Affidavit upon oath and affirmation of belief and personal knowledge that the following matters, facts and things set forth are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge:
In the first half of 2009, NH State Representative Laurence Rappaport, NH State Representative Carol Vita, and Mr. Lucien Vita met with New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney. The three requested that Attorney Delaney launch an investigation into the eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of President of the United States. The three individuals felt that the people of the State of New Hampshire might have been defrauded. Attorney Delaney refused to do so claiming that “it was a federal matter”.
____________________________________________________________________________
Lucien Vita
Carol Vita
Laurence Rappaport
DATED this the____day of _______________, 20__
________________________
Signature of Affiant
itooktheredpill
newssleuth
Miri
reneemary1001
Bridgette
The Congressmen who were at the hearing where Orly spoke are taking the decision of that Ballot Law Commission to the people in New Hampshire. They are holding a press conference on Wed. or Thursday. So it isn’t over in New Hampshire yet.
Here is a video of the woman, a former Congresswoman, who was appointed by the Speaker of the House in NH to the Ballot Law Commission. She was there. In her words what occurred. She lied during the hearing as to what the Commission’s responsibilities were and said they do not vet candidates. Yet they didn’t allow about 8 people on the ballot previously because they weren’t qualified, so they do vet them. Also the commission of 5 is made up of equal parties. When one leaves, another person of the same party is to be appointed. A Republican left and instead was replaced by a Democrat. Jane, the democrat, refers to the Orly and says there is nothing anyone can do to satisfy people like that…conspiracy theorists and the other women on the radio show refer to birthers. Ooops, gotcha Jane.
Jane Clemons admits on the air that her NH Ballot Law Commission Committed Election Fraud!
Uploaded by lmmortal Dyad on Dec 31, 2011
About 8:00 Recent challenge…Obama on the ballot that Obama is not a “citizen”…leaves out NBC.
About 9:34 Main challenger was Orly Taitz…came into challenge him being a “citizen.”
Within that video, there’s an excellent litany of the precedents that prove that Obama was NEVER eligible for the presidency. The quotes make it obvious that his father’s citizenship and allegiance disqualifies him. When obots cite the 14th amendment, it would be well to refer them to the statement by the very person who WROTE the 14th amendment. The man said that a person must be born to two U.S. citizen parents and have NO divided allegiance. Barry himself admits that his allegiance was divided AT BIRTH. He was born a British Subject. He later became a Kenyan citizen and also an Indonesian citizen. What’s unclear is if he EVER had any allegiance to the USA.
I hope that this woman does end up “doing one’s time.”
Smug. Disingenuous. Decries “extremists” when she IS one herself. It’s her way or the highway and YOU’RE the extremist for not walking in lockstep with her. Typical DemocRAT. Get ready. At 9:34 unbiased interviewer says that Jane will give a “more reasoned and objective” narrative of what happened at the commission meeting.
Jane’s “fail safe” is that if somebody finds out you lied to get on the ballot, then there’s a perjury charge waiting. Oh! What a gamble for an occupier. Unlimited power and at least 4 years to wield it, against the possibility that somebody can “find out” that you lied (when you’ve had expert ex-CIA guys and Sandy Burglar-like peeps “cauterize” EVERYTHING that could possibly allow anyone to “find out.”)
But, hey, Jane. WE’VE FOUND OUT. Haven’t we? So where’s the perjury charge?
By her own standard, this woman didn’t even find out that Barry was “born here.” Where’s HER proof for that belief?
The woman is illogical. She says they’re not investigative, don’t have the funds or the means to investigate, but they “looked at the filing and it was legitimate.” Huh? By what means did she determine that it was “legitimate?”
How much does it cost to ask the candidate to have a certified birth certificate send directly from the Hawaii Dept. of Health? Orly would have put up the 10 bucks; I would have.
If she’s so convinced that there’s a “conspiracy theory” perpetrated by “extremists”, then why aren’t they pursuing “perjury charges” against the sworn witnesses like Orly and others who were there?
The people with “proof” were Orly and her supporters. The ballot commission produced NO PROOF, so how does she claim that Orly and her supporters are “conspiracy theorists” who won’t accept the truth, no matter how much proof is presented? Illogical. Ridiculous.
Her objective report includes urban legends that she “heard” about people hiding out from the rabid conspiracy theorists in locked rooms and people being threatened. But there were no threats. Even their “investigation” proved that to be true.
Where’d they get the expertise and the budget to run that investigation?
Jane pats herself on the back because they do a “good job” and “vet our candidates.” HUH?
New Hampshire House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility on January 3
“WE NEED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.
The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/01/new-hampshire-house-of-representatives-members-to-hold-press-conference-on-obamas-eligibility-on-january-3/#comments
Who in the US Congress will join these brave patriots?
Stand up, Stand up!
Happpppy New Year!!
Seems he is the road block maybe ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Delaney_(New_Hampshire_Attorney_General)
Furniture again.
Furniture?
Yep Kathy. Just dig a while and they just pop up. Stan sold furniture and we also have Bassett, Sanders(son), Ashley, THOMASville,Polanski, Ethan ALLEN, Lane, Stanley etc.. THEN you get into the rugs, stores, textiles, plumbing fixtures,art, appliances, decor, lighting etc…a decorators dream Kathy.
Delaney….hummm..
Michael “Mike” Delaney (born 1969) is the current Attorney General of New Hampshire. Delaney was appointed to his current office by Governor John H. Lynch in August 2009.
NOTE*LYNCH*
http://www.international.to/usa/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8:president-obama-will-have-to-deal-with-birthers-&catid=17:politics&Itemid=20
This article regurgitates much of what we’ve said over the last few years, but it’s interesting to read it at this site, which I’d never seen before. It’s an Australian News service.
“Las Vegas 1 January 2011. President Obama has had a dream run to the White House and hopes to remain there for another term. His chances of re election are diminished by his failure to convince Americans that he is entitled to the office he holds.
There are many Americans who are concerned that Barack Obama is not who and what he says he is. Veterans like Robert Laity are frustrated that media outlets have not pressured President Obama into releasing a real authenticated copy of his birth certificate. There appears little doubt that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii but many people believe that he is not entitled to hold his office as he is ineligible due to the status of his parents. The President’s birth certificate would clear up that issue.”
Soooo Miri. The whole world discusses this but the importance is diminished here….soooo..lovely no ?
Talks around global water coolers include giggles and snickering with the whispers about this story….and America pretends it is a conspiracy ? Racism…?
We look like the butt of the world’s jokes Miri.
Miri,
How could you tell it is an Australian news service? It appears to be brand new site with few articles. I didn’t see any contact info. Dr. C for Con was there spreading his obot eligibility message. I left one too, but it went into moderation. If it isn’t published, it is a left wing site set up for the coming election. I expect if published, he will be raking me. Ohh well. He told one commenter that he had never read or seen Minor v Happersett. What a lie…the bots keep up with the lawsuits and the right wing blogs. It was an intimidation tactic. So I let him “see” it as well as mentioning how Justiagate came about. I said he was trying to make “Wong” a right!
I wonder how much Dr. C and his mighty bots are getting paid this year. Have they received annual raises for their excellent propaganda work? Will the basement bots ever see daylight again? Will they still have jobs in November?
I clicked on the “about us” thing at the top of the page. If you hover over the “Home” tab, it shows you an “about us” tab. That said they were an Australian news service, among other things: “International.to is a part of the Telegraph Group
( http://www.Telegraph.net.au ) The Group email address for staff and writers is International.to@gmail.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
International.to focuses on helping our users find the best of the world faster and easier. International.to is a News business and that is all.
News Services
International.to reporters and correspondents provide up to date reports and daily news from around the world.
We cover political news, sporting news, entertainment and current affairs from bureaus around the globe.
International.to is accredited to Australian Police Forces, Department of Defence, members of the Press Gallery, sporting promoters including ASP, V8 Supercars and many more. Our reporters gather news each day by attending pressers and conducting one on one interviews with news makers.
Australian politicians use International.to to reach a worldwide audience and respond to questions promptly to inform our readers.
Our senior writers and photo journalists are tertiary trained in media and broadcasting.”
So, it could be Australian progressive supporters of Barry. I noted the semi-lefty spin in the part about Barry obviously being born in Hawaii.
I didn’t read the comments yesterday! Too funny. Sam Sewell and Robert Laity (just learned his name yesterday) are there already. Bridgette, your comment shows up now. It’s a goody, as usual.
I especially liked what we learned from Jane’s NH video–that the guy who WROTE the 14th amendment agreed that nobody with DIVIDED allegiance at birth can be a natural born citizen. That’s why NOBODY born to ANYBODY who is NOT a US Citizen CAN BE a natural born citizen. Obama’s father NEVER had allegiance to the USA. (His mother probably never did either; but on paper, if she’s who they claim, then it must be supposed that she did.)
But there’s also the possibility, given various international laws, that when she married FOREIGN citizens, she lost her sole allegiance to the USA. First of all, because of the British Nationality Act, her marriage to BHO Sr. may have made HER a British subject, too. On paper. But that’s what counts in LAW, which is WHY he hides all the papers. She may also have given up her US citizenship voluntarily, when she moved to Indonesia and Barry became an Indonesian citizen.
There is reason to consider a Conspiracy to cover-up both Obama and McCain as Ineligible to be president by both Democrats and Republican elites because they found out that McCain was in question AFTER the Senate approved him and that kept Obama free from scrutiny because the democrats had this Questionable research on McCain and told him they would pitch it to the Public and call into question the republican parties ability to vet their own candidate and so how then could they say anything about Obama not being eligible . It is funny this was not a big debate in the main stream media?
This is how I think the Democrats were able to bribe the Republicans to stay shut up in 2008 and the last 2 1/2 years about Obama needing to prove eligibility to be Natural Born , its been a Bribe and a Cover-up from when this Law review was done in July of 2008 and If you remember McCain Lost his Power and force to challenge Obama about this time in the 2008 campaign.
This link is the 2008 claim of McCain’s ineligibility under Federal Constitutional law ;
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1157621
The Democratic party Defining this Natural Born Claim are doing under the guise of a 1608 ENGLAND COMMON Law instead of Constitutional law, through the CALVIN RULE, which basically says that you only need ONE parent a Citizen at the time of BIRTH to be Natural Born in this 1868 14th Amendment ruling,
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-20/opinion/chin.natural.born_1_natural-law-united-states-and-subject-citizenship-clause?_s=PM:OPINION
The Democratic Party will use this mess of Constitutional Interpretation as a platform to seek popular vote for Immigration reform gaining popular support from the disenfranchised and independent voting sectors.
We can expect it from CNN. This article is from April 20, 2011 by Gabriel “Jack” Chin, Special to CNN. I wonder what Jack’s status is. So much of what he has written is wrong that it is almost futile to analyze it. It is the basis of the Left’s interpretation for sure.
The very first sentence is a boldface lie.
“Unfortunately, the text of the Constitution does not define natural born citizenship, [TRUE] and neither the Supreme Court nor Congress has weighed in on the question.” [FALSE, FALSE]. Minor v Happersett defines NBC and Congress was kind enough to weigh in on John McCain’s eligibility even though he wasn’t born on US soil. Congress did “weigh” in even if they were wrong IMHO. They also weighed in multiple times trying to change the meaning and wording of NBC. Ask Claire McCaskill (D-MO) why she attempted to change the wording of the Constitution several times.. Interestingly, Congress didn’t change the wording for Claire or the 7 or 8 others who attempted to do so, and they haven’t upheld its presidential requirements either. They have chosen to ignore the screams from the people.
“This much is clear. The term “natural born citizen” was borrowed from the English concept of “natural born subject,” which came from Calvin’s Case, a 1608 decision..” [I DON"T KNOW about Calvin's Case.] I know the Constitutionalists relied on Vattel’s Law of Nations for definitions and understanding when the Constitution was written. The Founders intentionally made each word count. When the 14th Amendment was written it was to define those people who were eligible to become citizens. It did not address or change the definition of Natural Born Citizen. If one needed a law as in the 14th Amendment to define their citizen status, then they weren’t natural born citizens.
Checking on the news release under multiple searches for information on the NH Reps outing Delaney…zero, nada information.
hummm…
Checking on the news release under multiple searches for information on the NH Reps outing Delaney…zero, nada information.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/
That’s it ?
http://www.westernjournalism.com/new-hampshire-state-representatives-challenge-state-attorney-general-on-election-fraud-investigation/
This must be where the Ballot Challenge picked up the news from the western journalism news source. A news release that no media release to the public!?
Three state reps challenge their attorney general and it isn’t news?
Tells you quite a lot about our media in the age of Obama doesn’t it.
Bridgette, Miri, what do you feel about all of this ? Gut instinct. It is already getting mashy ? Va. too. I do not like the vibes. Too messy here already. Do you feel this also ?
Confusion.
This too;
http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/26/va-gop-changed-ballot-access-rules-last-month/
And I also read this;
Romney and Paul are the ONLY two candidates to follow the rules to get on the ballot in Virginia, and they are the ONLY two ELIGIBLE candidates.
Is someone tampering with the paperwork of candidates trying to get on ballots ? It just feels so dirty already to me.
Bridgette | January 1, 2012 at 11:55 am | Reply
I just watched the video of Jane Clemons.
Where do they come up with these professional liars? What is the history of this shill, with all of the talking points we’ve heard from the 2008 election? I am about to hurl. People like her are traitors to the Constitution and this Republic. We are being led by a tyrannical mob, I feel like I am living in Venezuela, watching our government dissolve right before our eyes.
It is astounding, isn’t it? May she go directly to jail! Orly has her on tape now.. How perfect is that to show and have proof of criminal intent and implicate the entire Ballot “Law” Commission in New Hampshire. I consider them psychopathic liars – they tell a lie so often that they begin to believe their own lies. They can’t tell the difference any longer because they have been doing it for so long. How can they trust each other…there is no such thing as trust or honor between them. It has been our glaring nightmare to observe the lack of morality and integrity within the government at all levels.
Are some of these DemocRAT operatives even smart enough to be shills? She certainly doesn’t seem particularly bright, especially since nothing she says hangs together, yet she seems to believe it, nevertheless. These are the true believers who WILL blindly follow, in lockstep, whatever their party tells them to say and do.
Of course, this is how and why they get appointed to such commissions in the first place. To be good little toadies, to do as they’re told, and to ask no questions (or even THINK about any questions raised by anyone else. Internal consistency not a requirement.)
Poopstockers are too young to realize the inconsistencies and maybe also too lazy to educate themselves. Perhaps too naive because of their youth to suspect any double cross or question the logic of their mentors. But it takes a special type of toady to manage to maintain that level of ignorance through adulthood.
It’s mass hypnosis, perhaps. Like what happened in Germany. Was anybody thinking back then? It’s frightening, in a way, how groups can devolve.
Did anybody else think it was extremely frightening to see ordinary North Koreans weeping and flailing their breasts all because Dear Leader bit the dust? Scary.
One wonders how they behave when a beloved parent or a child dies. This must be what comes from a nanny state on steroids.
Dear Leader WAS their parent. The one who did all and decided all for them. What WILL they do without him? It must have been a shock to learn he was, after all, mortal.
Mourners that did not cry well enough are now being sentenced and sent to camps there…
Well, that explains all the crying and rending of clothing. How freaking ridiculous. What kind of world has such people in it?
There is this one too Bob;
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57349486-503544/occupy-protests-send-gop-vote-counting-to-secret-location/
They don’t understand why Poopstockers would seek to disrupt the Republican “grassroots” caucuses? Don’t make me laugh. Does that guy really believe that Poopstockers are what they pretend to be? No! They’re just an arm of the DemocRAT machine. An arm of the Obama campaign. If they really were against “wall street fat cats”, then they’d be protesting and disrupting all of Barry’s events, too.
From the Left leaning Boston Globe.
NH lawmakers question Obama ballot status
January 3, 2012
CONCORD, N.H.—A small group of New Hampshire lawmakers and others want the attorney general to investigate whether President Barack Obama deserves to be on the presidential primary ballot.
State Rep. Laurence Rappaport, a Colebook Republican, said they asked the attorney general Tuesday to investigate, but have gotten no response. Rappaport said the issue is whether Obama is a natural-born citizen whose parents both were American citizens.
The White House released the president’s detailed Hawaii birth certificate saying his father was born in Kenya and his mother was born in Kansas.
The U.S. Constitution requires that a presidential candidate be a natural-born U.S. citizen or born abroad to parents who are both U.S. citizens; at least 35 years old; and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
The state Ballot Law Commission rejected an effort to take Obama’s name off the ballot because of questions about his citizenship.
Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley said it’s another example of how “crazy town” has taken over the Statehouse.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2012/01/03/nh_lawmakers_question_obama_ballot_status/
Finally… the news is getting to outside sources! Unfortunately, this is the leftist take on the press release. Pertinent information not included as in the three names of lawmakers and that the NH AG was asked to didn’t investigate Obama in 2009 and didn’t.
Look at what the writer added to the constitutional requirement for president…
“or born abroad to parents who are both U.S. citizens.”
Crazytown is what the DNC Party Chairman is calling Concord Reps!
I guess the author didn’t want anyone to know who wrote the article- no one put their name on it.
It is interesting that at least the reporter says that the Constitution requires TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS. Dropped the lie about being born in the USA and being a citizen are what matter.
NH Reps Press Conference on Obama (In)Eligibility and NH Officials’ Crimes in Enabling it- Report Later
The Ballot Challenge website reports that “Eight Republican NH reps, three newspapers, including the Monitor and one local TV station showed up, along with a small number of ordinary citizens and a couple of Democrat Reps” for the press conference.
Michael Miller [related to the Ballot Challenge site owner] was extremely proud of the NH State Reps, who stood up, almost alone among a handful American officials nationwide and called out the situation and perpetrators, for what they are, including the obvious usurpation of Obama and the enabling by their NH officials in helping to allow it to happen. Earlier on Tuesday, the affidavit published on this site yesterday, but filled out and signed, was served by the Reps and Mark Rosetti to employees of the SOS, since officials were not available.
The Monitor interviewed several people, including Reps, Cort Wrotowski and Michael, and took information about Obama Ballot Challenge
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/nh-reps-press-conference-on-obama-ineligibility-and-nh-officials-crimes-in-enabling-it-report-later
Where are the newspaper reports? Who were the Democrat reps and did they want to show their support or were they there to do the opposite? Only carried by a local news TV station…will it be picked up by others? Waiting for more news. Apparently Iowa is more important 24/7.
Someone, who, has usurped my posts. Is that possible? Something creepy again. I didn’t post that last post HOT Georgia. case not DISMISSEd. Who posted that?
alfy, I don’t know what you mean, but I posted that same news about the dismissal on the other thread, where we’re keeping information about these cases, where Barry MUST prove his eligibility.
Alfy, I had just moved your comments from the O Timeline to the correct thread, so your name came up with my post. It was corrected. The O timeline is not a conversational/dialog thread or research thread. It is to put pertinent information to be placed into the Timeline so that we don’t lose it in comments.
So no one usurped your post.
I was looking for that conversation earlier. Where is it NOW again ? I am now very confused. I must have missed something.
Thanks, Bridgette, you’d think I would realize O Timelilne for what it is by now. I figured something like this happened. Sorry
Have you see this yet? Finally a judge listened…let’s hope it remains that way:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/obama-must-resign-or-prove-his-eligibility-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-70510
We’re discussing it at that link. Thanks for the link to the WND article. It appears that we scooped them, courtesy of Free Republic.
So that’s WND’s new format, huh? They got the judge’s initial wrong, I think. It’s M. Not W.
Perfect music accompaniment! See Jane behind bars!
NH House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility on January 3
Uploaded by KenyanBornObamAcorn on Jan 2, 2012
I always liked that song. Awww. They left us off their blog roll.
We are now on their blogroll.
TY!
Hi Bridgette,
I am on the MA/NH border and have been watching for news of this hearing like a hawk.
More smoke, mirrors and dancing around, I’m afraid:
http://www.concordmonitor.com/blogentry/294017/meeting-canceled-between-speaker-lawmakers-over-obama-citizenship-complaint?CSAuthResp=1325624241%3Aat3p46hm0vj11nek311pq7p091%3ACSUserId%7CCSGroupId%3Aapproved%3A44A80BA982AC8BC52BA3AA13CF3B5D78&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
That story is from the end of November.
Oops, sorry, Miri; I’ll keep looking as there *must* be some results forthcoming.
The Concord Monitor was there and nothing yet..I guess they employ slow writers.
I’ve been looking to hear something too.
Oh, howdy, SueK!
DELIBERATE SUPPRESSION OF THE NEWS by the media! Unconscionable!
I think that if I do start to see this story in the lamestream, then I WILL start to worry that it’s a double cross.
Don’t tell me you’re starting to think like me Miri. I know, I’m always looking for the weirdest things to come out of what looks to be good.
I think I have noticed a pattern. Have you? I’m sure you have. The lamestream won’t report anything about the birth certificate until it’s good news for them or some way to help promote Barry’s Alinsky lies. So if they start reporting that Malihi ruled against Barry’s lawyers, then I will worry, because that may indicate that they’re setting it up so people notice when a court rules him eligible.
Exactly, and then the media will label them as “crazy birthers”.
Here I go with something that will probably either be dismissed, or make someone think I am trying to make an argument or throw a wrench in our excitement over this latest law suit in Georgia. I don’t intend to do either..But hear me out.
I have been plagued by something for a long time that I of course can’t get the clear answers to but something that won’t go away in my methodical and menial tasklike brain. This issue of Obama being foreign because of his foreign born (so called) father. I have had a problem all along as to why this has been such a blatant position, even by Barak himself. I had never been able to figure why this could be so.
In scanning over my trusty “Family Legal Advisor” by Alice K. Helm,LLB, JD I was drawn to the law about illigitimate children born to a mother not married. While law generally claims citizenship to a child to be that of the fathers (I am not talking Natural, just citizenship), in the event the father isn’t claimed or named on the childs bc. the citizenship becomes that of the mother’s. This has stuck with me over and over,and after all that has been looked into no one can completely say this did not occur. Remember who said Obama’s mother was very single when she had O.
Or tha O. himself he looked at all his records and papers and didn’t have the nerve to look into the particulars, giving himself plenty of room to later come back and say his mother was not married to his father till later.
Now forgive me,but does this give him some room for more political posturing or escape this new set of problems. While I have no idea if Barak is really a child from either parent that he claims, this scenerio keeps plaguing me, given what we know.
Well maybe SueK being a lilttle closer to the action will get some news in her neck of the woods, if lucky. Hope she’ll keep us posted. Thanks for chiming in. Today, injoyed checking you guy’s posts. Hope I didn’t ‘overdo’ my welcome today with little tidbits and incenues, as you guys were on a fairly continuous good read. I sorta felt like I was breaking up the posts, but Hey, I just couldn’t help myself. Informative and I’m still thinking on “elilsions” and “GLASSECTOMY” visions are dancing in my head! Gosh what a great piece for a good political cartoonist, to take us into the 2012 election,.Wha,ha, ha, ha…
alfy, since you’re artistically inclined, I would love to see your version of Barry with a glassectomy. Do you envision him with his head between his knees (then we couldn’t see his eyeball staring out of the glass belly button) or do you think he’s limber enough to do the limbo and loop his head backwards in order to shove it up …
bwahahahaa
a slimeball
limber? hmmm.
definitely slick.
I can’t EVEN respond to that jeeeZz……Oh I have my visions. This is just the best word to come down in a long time. It stirs the imagination….and makes my stomach hurt too!!!1
Howdy, Kitty
.
Hi alfy,
I know a few people in the Concord, NH area; trying to get in touch now. I’ll certainly post whatever I find out. Let’s hope there *is* news from the hearing today!
Welcome to Obamaland..
http://wtpotus.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/obamaland.gif
h/T Free Rep.
wow. true, that.
good one
Have you all seen this? It looks lik we maybe getting somewhere!
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
Election Fraud and the NH AG
NH state Representatives Laurence Rappaport, and Carol and Lucien Vita, and taxpayer Mark Rossetti, et al, deliver an affidavit to the NH Attorney General’s office regarding ongoing allegations of election fraud, followed by a press conference, 1/3/2012.
http://nhcjr.blogspot.com/
NH Lawmakers: Obama ballot challenge unfairly denied
By Maddie Hanna / Monitor staff
January 4, 2012
New Hampshire election law officials previously rejected their request to remove President Obama’s name from the ballot in advance of next week’s presidential primary, but that hasn’t stopped several state representatives, who yesterday presented what they said was proof that officials had unfairly denied their challenge to the president’s citizenship… [well, actually natural born. I offered a tutorial on the subject citizenship- G.M.]
more …..
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/301974/lawmakers-obama-ballot-challenge-unfairly-denied?
You scooped me, Bridgette. I’m surprised this took until today to be published.
Nothing further from contacts up in NH; they’re as disgusted as we are.
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/301974/lawmakers-obama-ballot-challenge-unfairly-denied?page=0,0&CSAuthResp=1325688519%3Aat3p46hm0vj11nek311pq7p091%3ACSUserId%7CCSGroupId%3Aapproved%3A95533566B7D8BCE10EA2EBF2BF90606F&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
Summing up: They argue that the difference in the precedents is that the other candidates didn’t LIE.
“If the person admits it, then we can take you off the ballot,” Gardner said. “But if you don’t admit it, we don’t investigate. We don’t deal with Social Security or try to find out. We’ve never done that.”
Splitting yet more hairs: They argue that Orly made allegations about criminal activities, which they’re not set up to investigate. They blew right past her challenge to Obama being placed on the ballot due to his ineligibility, which they are tasked with investigating. And now they say they can’t investigate “complaints about a sitting president.” Cute. So Obama, being the sitting potus, is in a different class than other candidates? I think not.
Besides, he’s not sitting; most often, he’s standing on the links.
Finally, as for the complaint that the AG didn’t investigate when asked, they claim the complaint didn’t ASK for an investigation. Amazing.
The AG of all people should know the rules of evidence…..
Obama has admitted that Obama Sr was his father….in all of his books as well as the BC he produced…. This IS an admission. Technically it is an “admission against interest” and not excluded as heresay in a court of law
Good point, AOne! I forgot that technicality that I knew from years of watching Perry Mason and other such legal shows.
Excellent! Admission against interest. I like it! The AG should ALWAYS know the rules of evidence, but they tend to forget the rules when it comes to their messiah.
So he ADMITS it and like the others should be THROWN OFF the ballot like they were.
The lawyers in the case should know about that so they can add the argument to their filings.
I agree Miri. How ?
Maybe someone who’s in touch with them can send them that argument: That Barry DID admit that he was born a British subject and became a Kenyan citizen. So he admits he’s ineligible, so they can pitch him off the ballot.
So what does admission against interest mean?
Normally an out of court statement, such as his book or things he said outside of a courtroom are heresay, and cannot come in as evidence, but an admission by a party does come in….. Therefore if he said that Sr, a Kenyan was his father, that is an admission……
As Miri said, there was no dispute as to the facts…. There was nothing to investigate.
AOne! It was YOU who discovered that truth. You’re too modest! It didn’t occur to me that he made an ADMISSION, just like the other candidates, until you pointed it out! TY. It’s a great argument. The lawyers in the case should know about that so they can add the argument to their filings. Of course, those people are ridiculous. Jane contradicts herself almost every time she opens her mouth. So logic will mean little to them. They are DemocRAT operatives and will do as INSTRUCTED.
Dr. Michael Savage says where is it written that farmers in Iowa, and throwbacks in NH predict our next President!!!
dr savage rocks.
its not written anywhere. point?
just saying its cool to see Americans in motion, participating in their government,
Iowa has 99 counties or something. why do they want to be bossed by the will of the heaviest? Like Philadelphia is to Pennsylvania, for example. Most of the state isn’t a metropolis on the waterfront with a political machine. its like moby vs guppy, that’s the impetus.
Historical precedent:
And
Per the “Obama birth narrative”, he was born a British subject because his father was a British subject. Obama’s own campaign web site admitted that in 2008.
The problem is that many people think that “native born” (born on U.S. soil) automatically makes someone a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America. But that is inaccurate.
“Georgia judge to hear arguments on eligibility of Barack Obama on ballot; Orly Taitz hails decision”
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2012/01/04/1880356/georgia-judge-to-hear-arguments.html
Do we know anything about Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi?
This has the potential to produce a good outcome (Obama deemed ineligible for the office) or a bad outcome (Obama deemed eligible for the office and/or Orly Taitz gets fined again by a Judge who claims that she is filing a frivolous suit), and it seems that Orly may be counting her chickens before they’re hatched:
I believe that the “Obama birth narrative” makes him ineligible to hold the office because the historical precedent is that one had to be born on U.S. soil, to U.S. citizen parents, in order to be a natural born citizen of the United States. (See references above.) But, Orly needs to proceed with caution.
Pill
The judge has already denied depositions……sign of what’s coming
http://www.scribd.com/doc/77037880/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Motion-to-Take-Depositions-Denied-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-1-3-2012
Georgia Lawsuits and Ballot Challenge Information at the following URL
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/obama-must-resign-or-prove-his-eligibility-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-70659
We talked about him a little. The surname appears to be Persian. He’s about 52. He went to school in Boston. Lived in Cambridge and in California. He’s made “strict constructionist” rulings in the past, imo (which is limited because I’m no lawyer). He threw some people off a school board even though their supporters alleged it would be racist. He consolidated these ineligibility cases, which might have had as a goal to make one ruling that shuts down all debate. Some plaintiffs are filing to sever the consolidation because in their cases they don’t address the “criminality” aspects, like the SS# (unless I’m mixing up GA and NH). They want to keep the cases separate so they can appeal separately, if necessary, and keep the discussion going. It’s possible for Malihi’s decision to be appealed before the end of January. If so, I’d expect Barry’s lawyers to run out the clock and appeal at the last minute. Is the court to which it would be appealed unbiased? We’ll find out. So far, it’s only hit the local news outlets.
“Obama’s Atlanta lawyer Michael Jablonski said Wednesday he’s optimistic that the judge will decide in the president’s favor.” http://www.wrdw.com/home/headlines/Ga_judge_to_hear_challenge_to_Obama_eligibility_136690123.html Whistling past the graveyard, or does he know something we don’t? He’s not talking appeal, which might be ominous. Same story here: http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/16448140/ga-judge-to-hear-challenge-to-obama-eligibility If it’s true that Orly can now depose the parties, then I would expect that they will hurry and appeal to stop that.
Here is another case….
Jefferson County judge sets hearing on request to dismiss suit over President Obama’s citizenship
Eric Velasco — The Birmingham News 01/04/2012 11:09 AM
BIRMINGHAM, Alabama — A Jefferson County judge today set a Monday hearing on a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship and right to be on the 2012 ballots in Alabama.
http://mobile.al.com/advbirm/pm_29179/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=gaJqdBmw
For those from Washington State who insult us, there’s this:
You cited, “§ 1401. NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF UNITED STATES AT BIRTH- The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
Allow us to point you to the actual words of the Constitution: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…”
Are you literate? Can you discern the difference between “NATURAL BORN citizen” and “national” or “citizen”? Do you understand what “subject to the jurisdiction of” means? If not, then read and EDUCATE yourself. (I resist the urge to name call in response.)
“What exactly did “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” mean to the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment? Luckily we have Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, author of the Thirteenth Amendment, and the one who inserted the phrase:
“The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means.”
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=14
Senator Howard concurs with Trumbull’s construction:
“I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Trumbull], in holding that the word “jurisdiction,” as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.”
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=16
Representative John Bingham again, considered the father of the 14th Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
“I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”
MIDDLE COLUMN 3RD PARAGRAPH:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=332”
A person can be a US citizen at birth (arguably, some want to remove that PRIVILEGE for “anchor babies) and still NOT be a NATURAL BORN citizen. A natural born citizen is one born in the USA, born within its complete and total allegiance, to TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS. Simple citizenship is not sufficient.
Obama ADMITS that he was BORN A BRITISH SUBJECT. HE LATER BECAME A KENYAN CITIZEN. HE LATER BECAME AN INDONESIAN CITIZEN. It’s arguable whether he ever was a US citizen at birth, but one presumes that he is NOW a US citizen. When he adopted that citizenship is not known, because he hides all his documentary history. HOWEVER, he was NOT “born into the jurisdiction” of the USA BECAUSE he was born into allegiance to the BRITISH CROWN, as a BRITISH SUBJECT. His father was NEVER a US citizen. Thus, he NEVER had SOLE, UNDIVIDED ALLEGIANCE TO THE USA. Thus, he is not and never will be eligible to be the president, absent a Constitutional Amendment. NO LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS can change the Constitution. NO LAW. The ONLY WAY to make him eligible is by Constitutional Amendment.
Is this being sung to the tune of “Obots won’t you come out tonight, come out tonight, come out tonight?”
Great comment, Miri!
Barack Hussein Obama I as born in a British colony and was born a British subject… subject to the jurisdiction of the British crown. He was never a U.S. citizen, and was never permanently domiciled in the United States.
According to the “Obama birth narrative”, Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Hawaii to Barack Hussein Obama I and Stanley Ann Dunham Obama. He was born a British subject… subject to the jurisdiction of the British crown. His own campaign web site said so, in so many words…
Speaking of the 14th amendment, check out how the Obama campaign initially claimed:
But then they scrubbed that text and replaced it with this:
They’ve updated that page again…
http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
Oh, yes. Maybe the waiver was granted. And maybe his lawyer got his long-form. But WE the PEOPLE have NEVER seen that paper.
If Obama truly wanted to “put an end to this
fake[very real] controversy”, he would do the same thing with his Birth Certificate as was done with this certificate and this certificate. The State of Hawaii sent both of those certificates, under seal, directly to Congress.If Obama really wanted to put the Birth Certificate issue to rest, he would authorize the State of Hawaii to send his Birth Certificate under seal directly to Congress.
As we all know, what Obama “released” was a multi-layered PDF that many people think is a forgery. He has never “released” the hard copy document to anyone, even though Members of Congress have a Constitutional obligation, under section 3 of the 20th Amendment, to ensure that the President and Vice President have qualified.
And the State of Hawaii did not say, “Obama was born in Hawaii” until after the U.S. House of Representatives said so first.
It wasn’t until a few hours after the U.S. House voted in favor of H. RES. 593 (which included the words, “Obama, was born in Hawaii”) that Dr. Fukino (seemly out of the blue) released her second News Release.
Could Fukino have used H. RES. 593 as “prima facie” evidence to issue her second News Release and finally make the claim “Obama was born in Hawaii”?
I think the answer is yes, based on
H.Res. 593 was authored by Neil Abercrombie while he was a Representative. Was Neil Abercrombie then rewarded with the Governorship of Hawaii?
The whole thing is more than just a little fishy.
Again, if Obama really wanted to put the Birth Certificate issue to rest, he would authorize the State of Hawaii to send his Birth Certificate under seal directly to Congress, just as was done with the other two certificates that were relevant to his election.
Then, we could “move on” to the issue of being born a natural born British subject is mutually exclusive with being born a natural born citizen of the United States of America.
Exactemente, Red Pill! Excellent summary. It is VERY REAL and CRUCIAL to “move on”. He needs to MOVE ON. As does his “lovely” wife, her excellency.
What an interesting progression of information.
I didn’t know they still had their Fight the Smears site still up. Interesting changes. Why didn’t they update again to say that the CertifiCATE of Live Birth (legal birth certificate) was presented. Why are they still using the short form as their proof entitled CertificaTION of Live Birth?
Yes, let’s put an end to the fake Obama and his merry Marxists. Grow the economy…when all they have done is stifle it! What a joke.
Do they take comments at that site or just IP numbers?
New Hampshire Representative Recaps Press Conference of Jan.3
WILL MEET WITH SPEAKER ON JANUARY 6
by Sharon Rondeau Snips
Rep. Harry Accornero was one of approximately 12 New Hampshire legislators who attended a press conference in Concord on January 3, 2012, to object to the decisions of the Ballot Law Commission and the New Hampshire Supreme Court in denying reconsideration of placing Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot
(Jan. 5, 2011) The following is an interview conducted with New Hampshire Rep. Harry Accornero (R-Laconia), who helped to organize a press conference in Concord with the purpose of informing the public that Barack Hussein Obama might not be constitutionally eligible to serve as president.
REP. ACCORNERO: It’s not a Republican issue; it’s not a Democrat issue; it’s a constitutional issue. I don’t care where he was born; this man’s father was born in Kenya, which was a British colony at that time. He cannot be a natural born Citizen.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/05/new-hampshire-representative-recaps-press-conference-of-january-3/
Mr. Boyer mentions NBC in his article. Birthers aren’t focusing on their old question re BHO’s birthplace..now it is the constitution! Dave, we have always been focused on eligibility according to the constitution..it is idiot reporters who couldn’t get beyond the BC. At least on multiple fronts NBC is being mentioned and the BC is taking a backseat in reporting.
New Hampshire lawmakers question Obama’s citizenship
By Dave Boyer January 9 Snips
CONCORD, N.H. — President Obama is on the Democratic ballot for New Hampshire’s primary on Tuesday, despite the efforts of some Republican state legislators who argue the president doesn’t qualify as a “natural-born citizen.”
“I don’t know where he was born, and I really don’t care,” said state Rep. Larry Rappaport of Colebrook, N.H., “but I think fraud is being perpetrated on the citizens of New Hampshire.”
Mr. Rappaport and several GOP colleagues have been trying to get the New Hampshire secretary of state to remove Mr. Obama from the ballot. Their argument isn’t focused on the old question of the president’s birthplace, but on a clause in the U.S. Constitution that requires a candidate to be a “natural-born citizen.”
The Republican legislators and their supporters say Mr. Obama doesn’t meet the definition of “natural-born citizen” because his father was Kenyan. They are relying on an 1875 Supreme Court decision that said a natural-born citizen is someone whose parents are both U.S. citizens at the time of his or her birth.
cont.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/9/new-hampshire-lawmakers-question-obamas-citizenshi/?page=1
Here’s a Washington Times story about NH:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/9/new-hampshire-lawmakers-question-obamas-citizenshi/
Just a taste:
“Their argument isn’t focused on the old question of the president’s birthplace, but on a clause in the U.S. Constitution that requires a candidate to be a “natural-born citizen.” [First THEY mischaracterize the argument for 3 years, now they make it appear as if birthers flip flopped and are making up a new argument, as if it weren't NATURAL BORN citizenship all along.]
The Republican legislators and their supporters say Mr. Obama doesn’t meet the definition of “natural-born citizen” because his father was Kenyan. They are relying on an 1875 Supreme Court decision that said a natural-born citizen is someone whose parents are both U.S. citizens at the time of his or her birth. [Got that subtext? Birthers are relying on OLD STUFF. Ancient history. It's outdated.]
After the legislators’ complaint was rejected by the New Hampshire’s Ballot Law Commission, Mr. Rappaport and his colleagues filed an affidavit last week with the state attorney general to argue that the state isn’t applying election law consistently. But the attorney general’s office said it doesn’t intend to take any action.
State Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley attended a press conference held by the Republican legislators last week and described himself as perplexed.
“Since I didn’t have my tin-foil hat with me, I really didn’t understand what they were talking about,” Mr. Buckley said. “The shocking thing isn’t that there are people out there who fervently believe such nonsense, but that these people are elected officials.””
A plethora of Alinsky tactics and NLP ridicule: He’s perplexed because he’s sane; he can’t understand because he’s sane. He doesn’t wear a tin-foil hat like these crazy birthers; he doesn’t believe “nonsense” like those crazy birthers. What is NONSENSE? It’s simple:
The Constitution REQUIRES a POTUS to be a “natural born citizen”.
To be a natural born citizen, one must be born in the USA to TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS.
IF a candidate doesn’t meet those criteria (and the others in the Constitution related to age and residency), then that person isn’t eligible to be POTUS.
Obama is not a natural born citizen, so he shouldn’t be on the ballot. Case closed. No nonsense at all. PERFECT SENSE, AS A MATTER OF FACT.
WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? HE COULD PROVE IT’S NONSENSE SIMPLY BY PRESENTING TO THE JUDGE THE ACTUAL 3-D, CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE. HE DOESN’T DO THAT. WHY NOT? THAT’S WHAT’S NONSENSE. NON SENSE AS IN, IT MAKES NO SENSE.
WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
James O’Keefe strikes again! He should hold classes for journOlists and Cablelistas or whatever their new name is!
VIDEO: NH poll workers shown handing out ballots in dead peoples’ names
1:15 PM 01/11/2012
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Video footage provided exclusively to The Daily Caller shows election workers in New Hampshire giving out ballots in the names of dead voters at multiple voting precincts during the state’s primary election on Tuesday.
The bombshell video is the work of conservative filmmaker James O’Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas.
Voters in the Granite State are not required to present identification to vote. O’Keefe’s investigators were able to obtain ballots under the names of dead voters at polling locations Tuesday by simply asking for them, he said.
“Live free or die,” an election worker told one of the investigators in the video. “This is New Hampshire. No ID needed.”
In an interview with TheDC on Wednesday, O’Keefe said the exposé shows how voter fraud can be easier to perpetrate when identification isn’t required.
“There is fraud going on and our goal is to visualize it for people,” he said.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/11/video-nh-poll-workers-shown-handing-out-ballots-in-dead-peoples-names/#ixzz1jBMGj1EG
Dead voters both Republicans and Democrats get to vote in preidential primary in New Hampshire.
On January 10th, Project Veritas reporters walked into New Hampshire Polling Locations during the Presidential Primaries, saying dead people’s names. We stated the name of a dead person we got from the NH obituaries. The names of the deceased were both Registered Republican and Democrats And in almost every case, saying a dead person’s name, we were handed a ballot to cast a vote. We used no misrepresentation and no false pretenses. in fact, in almost every case, we insisted we show ID and they insisted that we vote without showing ID.
James strikes again! That is really amazing. Hat’s off to James. He sure makes Russ Carnahan look like a fool today. No evidence of vote fraud? Nope. See no evil.
OMG. Brilliant. He’s brilliant. They really should expect him by now, but they don’t, do they?
Can you believe it? Don’t they even make them SIGN their names? Don’t they even have to prove they live at that address? Nope! They just hand them a ballot.
They don’t even ASK the guy if HE’S the person he names! They ASSUME. The guys were careful to ask, “do you have a (name of the person).” Then they just say, “that’s the address.” Never do they say they’re that person! So actually, in NH, the registered voter doesn’t even have to be dead. All the RATS have to do is BEAT THE REAL PERSON to the polls and vote for him or her! Unbelievable.
God bless James O’Keefe.
Note the ages of the people that died..many elderly. The people pretending to be that person don’t have the voices of elderly people. Easy as pie in New Hampshire to cast a vote…just pretend and give an address. I guess they also found that deceased people’s names are not purged in the voter rolls. Not once did the pretend voters cast a ballot. It is all coming to light as to how it is done!
This is where ACORN comes in, I think. Give them the names of deceased voters. Reprehensible.
Bravo James, Bravo! Again, another job well done!
What a case for voter ID! Now to get rid of the rigged voting machines! USE PAPER BALLOTS…Well those they can miscount, lose, hide, or whatever. Ethics…none. Win at all costs.
Exactly. It’s why they like “motor voter”, too. It just bloats the registration list. Obviously, the official was “misinformed” when he said deceased people are purged within days. Maybe so, but how often do they reprint those lists? It’s bad enough that it’s so easy with the mail-in voting, early voting, and absentee voting. I thought that it would be far less easy at the actual polling place. No wonder the democRATS all say there’s “no evidence” of fraud. They make sure there’s no way there can BE evidence. They need to go back and audit all the elections to see how many dead people voted in those elections. This is so unfair. If James can figure it out and so easily pull off this sting, you KNOW that ACORN has it down pat. They don’t have to worry when they vote for dead people. The “zombies” aren’t going to show up to vote twice. Unbelievable! They don’t even ASK them for their name! I suppose they don’t even list the ages ON the rolls. Just the name and address. The democRATS oppose PHOTO IDs. This state doesn’t even ask for ANY ID! This is such an embarrassment to NH.
Notice most the dead voters are fairly new dead,so they haven’t gotten purged from the voter roles. Remember I said this is how my grandfather got voted out of office by the counties cemetary. I just didn’t know this still occured this easy. This is such ashame.
What’s not shown is how someone goes to a county and rents a house for a month or two….on his computor he checks for deaths in that county . He checks voter roles. He sends in an early voter ballot , and then checks out of town. I know , I should say I feel sure something like this was happening in Florida, where else, we’ll never know. The ballots in some counties are not checked against a database, because the database is not complete. (I was told the database was not sufficient during the Obama election.) I asked several questions at the elections office because,when I called to get an absentee mail in ballot. I was concerned that students were abel to vote in the county where they attend school and then vote again in their home county.
That’s exactly what they do–vote in both locations. Unethical people with more than one home, in more than one state, do the same. There’s no cross-referencing, that I know of, between voter roles in adjacent states. This is something else that the DemocRATS oppose. In some states, before any election, the election board sends a card to the home of every voter. That is the way they verify that the person lives there. When they vote, they bring the card as identification AND they must sign a book, so the signature is able to be compared against the signature from when the person registered. Sometimes, if they don’t have the card, they must show some other proof that they live at the location. This is outrageous. Again, there’s no “evidence” because they don’t look for it AND because, when ACORN is caught, they are given a slap on the wrist, so no “convictions” that serve as “evidence”.
Boy, the left has it out for James..may face voter fraud charges? Really..in what universe? TP are good initials for the one group, and the other blog’s name speaks for itself. Blind or simply stupid? Non-existent ..I guess they made the video up! If you want to read them, you can find the URL. Another turn around…like they use the same playbook as Omar. Attack the other person and play victim while assuming no blame. People can tell right from wrong idiots.
The title of Think Progress’ Hit job:
James O’Keefe’s Group Appears To Commit Voter Fraud In Order To Order To Gin Up Hysteria Over Non-Existent Fraud Problem
By Scott Keyes on Jan 11, 2012 at 4:20 pm
James O’Keefe’s latest video features surrogates appearing to commit voter fraud in yesterday’s New Hampshire primary election, all in an attempt to highlight voter fraud, a problem which is by-and-large nonexistent in the Granite State! [by and large?? until exposed]
From the other Leftist Blog that is as dirty as TP (spelling not required)
James O’Keefe May Face Voter Fraud Charges [Sure..in your dreams!] Title was changed to: O’Keefe May Have Committed Voter Fraud
Daily Beast
Jan. 11, 2012
In an attempt to prove how not requiring identification at the polls in New Hampshire can lead to votor fraud, notorious conservative activist James O’Keefe may have committed a fraud himself.
~
Unfortunately for O’Keefe, the only one who actually may have committed voter fraud during Tuesday’s election was him. Just obtaining ballots “that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held” is illegal.
We could have predicted that one. Did you see that the NH newspaper reported the “attempt” as if the election worker foiled a plot to vote fraudulently. NO, it was a journalistic sting, just like 60 Minutes does. No difference. James and the other reporters were VERY careful to never impersonate the deceased person and to NOT vote. They may try to get them on the technicality that they accepted the ballots, but each made clear he wouldn’t vote without showing his ID. They pass out those ballots like candy, to ACORN and via mail for absentee voting, so just accepting a ballot isn’t fraud. CASTING it IS fraud, but so far they don’t bother to find and prosecute all the people who do it.
How does one OBTAIN a ballot that’s “known by the person to be materially false?” This would seem to refer to ACORN, which acted as a broker, handing out blank ballots and receiving back BOGUS ones to forward to the elections offices. Right? How’s a ballot false if it’s blank?
What fools. There’s a “nonexistent” problem. I can’t imagine ANY honest person not being alarmed at the FACT that anybody can just waltz into the polls in NH and get and cast a ballot without showing that they even live in NH! Without showing who the hell they are. Registered voters should be appalled because it means anybody can impersonate them and cast their ballots for them. Then be LONG GONE and impossible to catch by the time they show up to cast their own ballot. Then they will have to go through a bunch of stuff to get it sorted out. I can imagine the obots using just such a ploy to create chaos at the polls. Then they’ll scream “count every” fraudulent “vote.”
You aren’t going to believe this one! Oh yes, you will.
NH AG Investigating Election Offenses
Jan. 13
Oh, Lordy! The New Hampshire Attorney General is FINALLY investigating Obama Ineligibility? He’s investigating criminal violations by the Ballot Law Commission, criminal violations by the SOS and AG? He’s investigating the fraud of allowing dead people to vote?
No. NONE of the above.
Instead, he is investigating the people who EXPOSED the dead people voting fraud scandal. [That means James O'Keefe!] It doesn’t get much weirder than this folks. Yes, it was probably illegal to videotape inside of a polling place, just as it was illegal to steal the Pentagon Papers, or illegally video record the Acorn fraudsters. It was a LOT more illegal to defraud the people of NH and the nation of a fair election. But, which one does our trusty AG jump on?
Any illusions I might ever have had about upstanding New Englanders running the squeaky clean First Primary in the Nation– ideal American Democracy in Action– are shattered.
This Michael Delaney is a weak corrupt, cartoon of an Attorney General. Add to that William Gardner, the corrupt Secretary of State, in office since 1975, who allowed all of this to happen under his watch. They seemingly had it in their power to make this all right, but didn’t. It is people like them who are willingly allowing, even enabling, our country to go to hell in a handbasket. Prove me wrong–PLEASE.
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/nh-ag-investigating-election-offenses
NH AG Investigating O’Keefe Group for Undercover Vid Showing Them Posing as Dead Voters to Get Ballots
January 12, 2012 Snips
The New Hampshire attorney general‘s office is investigating after a video surfaced that appears to show people using the names of deceased individuals to obtain ballots on the day of the state’s presidential primary, the New Hampshire Union Leader reported.
New Hampshire state law makes it illegal to use a false name to obtain a ballot. It’s also a crime to make an audio recording of someone without their consent or to “record an election official without permission.”
According to the Union Leader, [newspaper?] state Associate Attorney General Richard Head said his office became aware of the effort on Election Day and began investigating immediately. “That investigation is ongoing,” he said. “Based on the information received on Election Day and the information on the video, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of voting procedures with the Secretary of State.”
U.S. Attorney for New Hampshire John Kacavas told the newspaper he hadn’t heard of the video as of Wednesday.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/nh-ag-investigating-okeefe-group-for-undercover-vid-showing-them-posing-as-dead-voters-to-get-ballots/
Oh, I see. The REAL crime was videotaping. They just simply cannot allow ANY “EVIDENCE” to come to light that proves the VOTE FRAUD that everybody knows happens. John Fund, where are you?
““Based on the information received on Election Day and the information on the video, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of voting procedures with the Secretary of State.”
U.S. Attorney for New Hampshire John Kacavas told the newspaper he hadn’t heard of the video as of Wednesday.”
Is that promising? They’re going to do a “comprehensive review of voting procedures?” What exactly does that mean? How to prevent reporters in future from knowing exactly how lax their standards are or showing how easily fraud can be perpetrated? Are they going to ensure that those dead people’s names are purged “daily” as the official falsely claimed?
No surprise that the NH AG hadn’t hear of it; the lamestream doesn’t report it!
“Secretary of State William Gardner, as well as city clerks in Manchester and Nashua, quickly said Wednesday that they support the idea of voter identification, but not the voter photo ID bill that Gov. John Lynch vetoed last year.
Officials in Nashua and Manchester said the filmmaker should be arrested.
“They should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. When I was in the Senate, I always heard, ‘This never happens.’ This is proof this happens,” said Manchester Mayor Ted Gatsas.
“People who pull stunts like this should be prosecuted,” Nashua City Clerk Paul Bergeron said”"
When that clown was in the senate he “always heard” that filmmakers never come into the polling place to prove how easy it is to perpetrate vote fraud and cancel out the legitimate votes of real citizens (living ones)? Where is Eric Holder looking into the disenfranchisement of voters in NH, when they obviously allow anybody and everybody to vote without proving they even are eligible to vote?
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120112/NEWS0605/701129979
“It’s not impossible for a dead man to vote in the Granite State.
Secretary of State Gardner said a fraudulent voter could check newspaper obituaries for recently dead people, and then go to a city or town to see if the name is on voting lists.
The bogus voter could then go to a polling place and likely get a ballot, he said.
Gardner said he’s open to changes in state voting procedures, but not the legislation that Lynch vetoed.
Its provisional voting procedure would have been difficult to administer, Gardner said.
“I’m OK with photo ID, but I would like a way to do it without sending people home from the voting place without having cast a ballot,” Gardner said.
Republican House Speaker William O’Brien said Democrats have consistently maintained that no voter fraud takes place in New Hampshire. Now it’s been shown that flaws exist in the system.
“I’m afraid — I hope it doesn’t come down to this — it challenges our first-in-the-nation primary position,” O’Brien said.
He said Republicans are open to compromise as long as the New Hampshire voting pool is not diluted by non-resident or fictitious voters.”
“Secretary of State William Gardner
hummm…
Nashua woman angry that Project Veritas posed as her dead brother in ballot video
Friday, January 13, 2012 Snips
NASHUA – Madeline Larose had never heard of Project Veritas. That is, until she discovered that the conservative organization had used her brother’s name to obtain a ballot for Tuesday’s presidential primary. When she found out, she wasn’t happy. Her brother, Nashua resident Joseph Boucher, died about two months ago. “It’s horrendous … they’re even going after dead people now?” said Larose, who also lives in Nashua. “In my estimation, they should be prosecuted.”
[Sanity would say, I am glad my brother's name could help in a small way to uncover voter fraud and ensure that Voter ID becomes the law He would have been proud. I hope they name it the Boucher Law!]
On Thursday, state Republican State Committee Chairman Wayne MacDonald said in a prepared statement that the video “underscores the serious need for a voter identification law in New Hampshire that protects the sanctity and ensures the integrity of our elections.” McDonald added that anyone involved in voter fraud should be punished. [Sanity Recognized!]
In a statement released Thursday, the state Democratic Party said the video was created solely to generate support for an ID law.“There has been no history of voter fraud in the state of New Hampshire – that is, until Tuesday, when GOP operatives manufactured it solely to gin up support for a discriminatory voter ID law,” said Harrell Kristein, state Democratic Party press secretary. “Their actions broke the law in order to make a false claim for the need for unnecessary legislation.” [Insanity recognized!]
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/946244-196/nashua-woman-angry-that-project-veritas-posed.html
so you can no longer ‘boucher your voucher’, that’s a good idea Bridgett
but..but..but..Boucher means CHANGE ya know ?