Orwell Meets Supreme Court Precedent

Down the Memory Hole…

Leo Donofrio has made a discovery of truly Orwellian activity…

JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED US SUPREME COURT OPINIONS.

The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.

I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waite’s statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).

I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com – including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive

posted by itooktheredpill

UPDATE: There’s much more evidence of historical tampering…
Justia Caught Sabotaging Supreme Ct. Rulings

As Orwell said:

“Who controls the past controls the future;
who controls the present controls the past.”

About these ads

45 responses to “Orwell Meets Supreme Court Precedent

  1. Everyone should read this……. It is very very serious …
    Then take a look at previous research on Sarah Herlihy
    And her Law Review Article As discussed below

    http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/12/was-sarah-herlihy-plant.html

    ……..”FRIDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2008

    Why Was Sarah Herlihy Worrying About Article II?
    Contrairimairi has forwarded a post from Insight Analytical concerning Sarah Herlihy’s article that was also discussed in the blog Count us Out. Someone had forwarded Herlihy’s article to me and I blogged it on November 29. Herlihy works for the law firm of Kirkland and Ellis out of their Chicago office. The kicker is that Herlihy’s article was published in the Kent Law review in 2006 and, notes Count us Out Blogger Creative Ogre: ………”

  2. “What did Congress know
    about ‘natural-born citizen’?
    8 tries at eliminating requirement
    suggests organized strategy in place”
    –WND

    http://www.wnd.com/

    • Someone at the Post and Email recently wrote about this very topic.

      Efforts to Eliminate the Natural Born Requirement (2003-2005)

      This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.

      Proving that the players involved knew the correct definition of natural born citizen borrowed from the Law of Nations by our founders – 1) those born in the country, of parents who are citizens; 2) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 3) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 4) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. – that they knew Barack Hussein Obama II did not meet that definition as a foreign or dual citizen via his father’s British citizenship and that they worked feverishly to find a way around this constitutional requirement for office, as Obama was about to become president…

      The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33 which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution –

      This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.

      http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/07/evidence-broadens-obama-natural-born-conspiracy/

    • SHOCKING NEW INFORMATION CONCERNING OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY

      This shows in video form the multiple attempts (8) to change the Constitutional requirement of natural born citizen.

  3. Can we find who runs Justia.com? Without knowing, I assume this is the “go to” place for attorneys to look up court cases, etc. Have they taken the place of books or wherever Court Cases are compiled? Instead of going to the law library, do attorneys rely on Justia?

    I guess we didn’t know what really corruption was until we have had to look it in the face for the last two 1/2 years. They have contaminated so many venues that it is unfathomable.

    We are a society of lawlessness at all levels; it is pathetic.

    This is right up the alley of the Joyce Foundation. Remember their collusion and attempt to influence the Supreme Court in cases regarding the right to bear arms? They give grants to universities and to students to write biased law reviews that will in turn be given to the Supremes when they are working on specific cases. The more cases they are shown with the anti-gun memes, the more influence there is. We don’t know what other legislation they are trying to persuade to their thinking (there is the environmental side that we know about).

    Speaking of the lady, Sarah, who wrote about the outdatedness of the eligibility clause of natural born citizen for the office of the president; wasn’t she an intern when that was written? I wonder who she was supposed to influence. Was she paid by the university out of a grant perhaps from the Joyce Foundation? It is not out of the realm of possibilities. Did we find she was a real person and not writing under a pseudo nom?

    Obama and Joyce Foundation Pay to Influence the Supreme Ct.

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/obama-and-joyce-foundation-pay-to-influence-the-supreme-ct/

    • Sarah Herlihy

      Law Clerk to the Honorable Michael M. Mihm, United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, 2005 – 2006 ***

      Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago-Kent College of Law, J.D., 2005 with High Honors

      Publications
      “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle”, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 275 (2006)

      ***USAID Honors Judge Michael M. Mihm
      Judge Michael M. Mihm
      Washington, DC — U.S. District Judge Michael Mihm was honored Friday evening, August 6, 2004, by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) at an Outstanding Citizen Achievement Citation Ceremony in the Robert H. Michel Student Center at Bradley University. This event culminated a number of activities to honor the voluntary service Judge Mihm has given to support rule of law and judicial development over the past 10 years in Russia.

      http://www.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/press/pub_rec/outstanding_citzn_achvmnt_mmihm.html

  4. From the Justia website:

    Based in the heart of Silicon Valley, [Mountain View - outside of San Francisco] Justia’s mission is to advance the availability of legal resources for the benefit of society. We are especially focused on making primary legal materials and community resources free and easy to find on the Internet. The company provides Internet users with free case law, codes, regulations, legal articles and legal blog and twittterer databases, as well as additional community resources. Justia works with educational, public interest and other socially focused organizations to bring legal and consumer information to the online community.

    http://company.justia.com/about.html

    They also do website design and management and legal marketing.

    • They appear to be a for-profit company. They provide free CENSORED legal materials for the benefit of society. Right.

  5. Tim Stanley

    Tim is a computer programmer, lawyer and CEO of Justia. Prior to starting Justia, he co-founded FindLaw and served as FindLaw’s CEO and Chairman. He is on the Board of Directors of Nolo and American Legal Net, and is on the Board of Trustees of Public.Resource.org. He is a member of the State Bar of California and was previously on the Executive Committee of the State Bar’s Law Practice Management and Technology Section. He is also a member of the American Association for Justice, American Bar Association, American Civil Liberties Union, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Tim has a BS & MS from Stanford University and a JD from the University of Michigan Law School.

    http://company.justia.com/about.html

    * Member, Board of Trustees at Public.Resource.Org
    * Member, Board of Directors at American LegalNet Inc.
    * CEO at Justia

    * Harvard Law School1992 – 1992
    * University of Michigan Law School JD 1989 – 1992
    * Stanford University BS 1986 MS 1989
    [Grew up in Ann Arbor, MI]

    We developed a US Supreme Court Center, with all of the US Supreme Court decisions with Oyez.org at supreme.justia.com.

    CEO
    Justia
    Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Internet industry
    April 2003 – Present (8 years 4 months)

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/tstanley

    • A photo of Tim

      Anybody a Twitterer that could leave a message for Tim and his dog?

      http://www.timstanley.com/

    • Oh, that’s good. He’s at Harvard right after Barry. And, of course, Barry’s brother Mark went to Stanford. Member of ACLU. What the heck is a computer professional for “social responsibility?” Are there computer professionals who oppose social responsibility? (Maybe all the programmers in prison?)

      Well, you can guess, can’t you? The usual progressive claptrap. From their website:

      “Liberating Voices: A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution, the book on the information and communication pattern language project that was launched at CPSR’s 2002 Shaping the Network Society conference (DIAC-2002), is finally available (From Powells Books, and other online and offline sources). Liberating Voices brings together ideas and suggestions from a variety of perspectives including activism and social change, education, community informatics, governance, media, development, information science, economics, journalism, arts and culture. It can be used by researchers, by practitioners in a variety of fields including teachers in the classroom, by activists, and by citizens and community members throughout the world.

      This book is particularly relevant at this moment in history. It’s a call for social change based on a peaceful revolution in grassroots information and communication. Inspired by the vision and framework outlined in Christopher Alexander’s classic 1977 book, A Pattern Language, the Liberating Voices manifesto takes the form of a pattern language containing 136 patterns designed to meet these challenges. Each pattern is a template for research as well as for social critique and action. And each pattern is linked to other patterns to form a single coherent whole — a pattern language. Douglas Schuler and the book’s 85 co-authors have tried to show that the struggle for liberatory information and communication systems is absolutely critical to a just and sustainable future.”

      CPSR is a global organization promoting the responsible use of computer technology. Founded in 1981, CPSR educates policymakers and the public on a wide range of issues. CPSR has incubated numerous projects such as Privaterra, the Public Sphere Project, EPIC (the Electronic Privacy Information Center), the 21st Century Project, the Civil Society Project, and the CFP (Computers, Freedom & Privacy) Conference. Originally founded by U.S. computer scientists, CPSR now has members in 26 countries on six continents.”

      In the mid-2000s, they got grants from “Ford” and “NATO”. They had their roots at Xerox and STANFORD, one of the first chapters in Palo Alto, CA, where … wait for it, Mark Ndesandjo lived in 1990. Say? Didn’t Mark go into COMPUTER stuff, too? GPS? Think he’s a member of CPSR? Here’s a timeline from their website: http://cpsr.org/prevsite/cpsr/timeline.html/ Meetings in Chicago in 1995.

      I don’t think, though, that they’d let their political ideology affect how they share the TRUTH about LEGAL cases for the BENEFIT of SOCIETY. Would they? Nah. These are open-minded SCIENTISTS for goodness sake. They have morals. They have ethics. Right?

      • About Douglas Schuler:

        http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/author/default.asp?aid=19761

        “Douglas Schuler is a member of the faculty at The Evergreen State College, former Chair of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), and a founding member of the Seattle Community Network (SCN). He is coeditor of several books, including Shaping the Network Society: The New Role of Civic Society in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2004) and the author of New Community Networks: Wired for Change.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_intelligence

        He’s on that “multiple intelligences” bandwagon: “A still more recent version is Douglas Schuler’s “Cultivating Society’s Civic Intelligence: Patterns for a New ‘World Brain'”.[10] In Schuler’s version, civic intelligence is applied to groups of people because that is the level where public opinion is formed and decisions are made or at least influenced. It applies to groups, formal or informal, who are working towards civic goals such as environmental amelioration or non-violence among people. This version is related to many other concepts that are currently receiving a great deal of attention including collective intelligence, distributed intelligence, participatory democracy, emergence, new social movements, collaborative problem-solving, and Web 2.0.”

  6. Stacy Stern

    Stacy Stern is President of Justia. She oversees all revenue and client operations, as well as marketing and partnerships. She provides leadership on Justia’s legal portal’s legal content and community features…
    She received her JD from Harvard Law School, where she served as an editor for the Harvard Environmental Law Review.

    http://company.justia.com/about.html

    • I checked the other day, because of her name. Unless it’s a married name, she’s not related to Andy Stern, but he has a brother named Tom who’s a lawyer in NC.

  7. Vasu Kappettu

    As Chief Technology Officer, Vasu leads the technology development and innovation efforts for Justia’s portal and client services products. Prior to Justia, Vasu was Manager and Senior Software Engineer at FindLaw, and was FindLaw’s first full time programmer.

    http://company.justia.com/about.html

  8. Privaterra’s mission is to provide technological education and support for civil society organizations (Human Rights NGOs) in the area of data privacy, secure communications and information security. Privaterra is:

    Working with human rights organizations to survey their privacy and security needs.
    Soliciting donations to try to meet these needs with hardware and software.
    Conducting workshops to teach civil society organizations how to improve their privacy and security situation.
    Collecting a large pool of resources relating to privacy and security for both public use and to help fulfill our mandate.”

    Nothing on their site about who funds them.

  9. http://www.publicsphereproject.org/temp/about.php

    “The Public Sphere Project (PSP) is an initiative of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) to help promote more effective and equitable public spheres all over the world. The Public Sphere Project is intended to provide a broad framework for a variety of interrelated activities and goals.

    Our activities will focus on the following objectives:

    • Advancing our understanding of opportunities and challenges of “public spheres” for democracy, education, education, social justice, economic development, and environmentalism.
    • Developing and acting on strategies for creating and strengthening equitable and effective public spheres.
    Legitimizing and calling attention to these concerns.
    Building and supporting networks of activists, researchers, and citizens.
    • Convening forums (both face-to-face and virtual) for sharing information, concerns, and ideas.
    Developing and disseminating useful, high-quality [CENSORED?] information for citizens, activists, students, policy-makers, and researchers.
    • Evaluating and consulting with existing projects, systems, applications, and organizations all over the world.
    Developing and evaluating relevant new interfaces, applications, systems, and organizations.
    • Helping to provide forums for underheard voices and issues.
    • Helping to build collaborative and deliberative systems.
    • Promoting interaction between the powerless and the powerful — and people in between.
    Engaging and encouraging individuals, NGOs, governments, and businesses.”

  10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Professionals_for_Social_Responsibility

    They have a Wiki page! “When CPSR was first established it was concerned solely about the use of computers in warfare. This initially was focused on the Strategic Computing Initiative, a US Defense project to use artificial intelligence in military systems, but added opposition to the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) shortly after the program was announced. The Boston chapter helped organize a debate related to the software reliability of SDI systems which drew national attention (“Software Seen as Obstacle in Developing ‘Star Wars’, Philip M. Boffey, (New York Times, September 16, 1986) to these issues. Later, workplace issues, privacy, and community networks were added to CPSR’s agenda.”

    So founded to be, basically, anti-Reagan Star Wars. Russians at some of their conferences. Sounds familiar. Disarm America. Unilaterally, by any means necessary. Right up Barry’s and his brother’s alley.

    So does EPIC: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Privacy_Information_Center
    I knew it was coming: EPIC is funded by the Open Society Institute (SOROS)
    And Omidyar (that also funds the Sunlight Foundation, which is associated with the Define American group founded by illegal alien, document fraud perp and journalist Jose Antonio Vargas–pushing for the Dream Act, by any means necessary). And the Ford Foundation, among many others: http://epic.org/epic/annual_reports/2007.pdf

    O, what a tangled web.

    • This is a statement on the Public.Resource.Org website where Tim Stanley is a Trustee on its Board of Directors. This may or may not apply to the way that Justia operates as well about removing information about court cases. But then again, I am probably giving them an excuse for their scrubbing of pertinent cases related to Obama’s eligibility. It has to be another one in that long line of coincidences.

      Will You Remove a Court Case?

      Public records are just that: information that needs to be available to the public. We will not remove any public documents without a court order. Remember, there are many, many copies of these court decisions in existence, and Public.Resource.Org has just one of those many copies. If you want information deleted, your only recourse is with the courts that issued the opinion. You should contact the court directly or hire an attorney to do so for you.

      Can You At Least Remove It From Google, Yahoo, or Microsoft?

      Yes, but only partly. If you send us a written request, we will tell search engines not to index the file on our servers, using a mechanism known as the robots.txt file. That means that, after a while, the copy of your case on our bulk.resource.org server would not show up on Google, Yahoo, or Microsoft.

      But, remember, many places have copies of these decisions from many different sources. So, even though the case will not show up on the search engine FROM OUR SERVER at bulk.resource.org, it is likely to show up from many other places, and we have no control over those other organizations. To have a case listed in our robots.txt file so it is not indexed by search engines, please send your written request to:…..

      https://public.resource.org/about/

      • Completely removing a file or keeping search engines from showing it is different from actually editing (censoring) the precise words of the case WITHOUT INFORMING READERS THAT IT’S BEEN EDITED.

        Although this company, Justia, has a disclaimer at the bottom of their site informing people they’re not responsible yadda, yadda, yadda (the usual), I think that LAWYERS who have relied on the accuracy of that website should now be VERY interested in the FACT that they apparently edit/censor cases for political reasons. They are so busted!

        This could be huge for them and their bottom line, if there is a bottom line. I don’t know what sort of entity this is. Is it a private company? Does it operate as a business? Or is it a not-for-profit that gets tax breaks and/or government grants, based upon a truthful mission statement–that they are providing factual information to the public? TRUTHFUL information or Orwellian-censored information? Are they supposed to act as a political arm of a specific movement or party, OR do they purport to be independent and non-partisan?

        Their swift reaction to Leo’s outing of their shenanigans, shenanigans which have had a HUGE impact on this country, seems to indicate that somebody’s worried for a reason.

        Leo had a case at SCOTUS before the election. Apparently many people relied on Justia when researching the pertinent cases. Had Leo discovered this precedent earlier, the past few years might have been very different for our country.

        Any citizen, I would imagine (LTC Lakin?), can arguably show damages from these actions, especially since the BOND decision speaks to the 10th Amendment and also because ballot placement is a function of STATE government. Had it been known that SCOTUS precedent showed that Obama was not eligible for the presidency, would states have put his name on the ballot? I think not. Somewhere, it’s to be hoped, there was a Sec. of State who would have stood up for the CONSTITUTION. It would at the very least have become an issue in the election. We the People had a right to know. Justia apparently tried to obfuscate a fact of which they must have realized the significance. Although it’s true that other resources had accurate rendering of the decisions.

        As with the lawsuit by WND against Esquire, lawyers like Leo (imo) might be able to sue Justia for its apparent mendacity.

        If this was not deliberate, then how do they explain it? The WayBack Machine doesn’t lie. The timing of the changes are too specific to be accidental. A jury can well decide what’s coincidence and what’s evidence of something worse.

        • Wow, that’s good info. It woud be nice to know if that Justia site gets any public or federal funding wouldn’t it?

          • It would be nice, but how to find out? Any ideas? Usually, a not-for-profit has information about its funding. I see nothing on Justia about that.

          • I wonder if Justia, because Stern is the president, got special breaks for being a female-owned business?

  11. http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questions

    It occurs to me that that CRS Memo also censored references to the one SCOTUS PRECEDENT that proves that Obama is and always was ineligible for the presidency. It misled Congress at a crucial point in time when citizens, en masse, were contacting their representatives about this dangerous violation of our Constitution.

    A link to Bridgette’s post about the CRS memo, as a refresher: http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/obamas-eligibility-congresss-memo-revealed/

  12. Actually there were two memos. That’s the other one.

  13. I don’t believe the CRS memos mentioned Happersett anywhere. It had to be deliberate. Just like it was no accident that Justia eliminated that case from their articles before the election.

  14. Remember, too, that the CRS memo did the same thing–omitted crucial information about a case being cited: http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/obamas-eligibility-congresss-memo-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-56504

  15. “This is direct evidence that somebody with a very sharp legal mind ordered these revisions at Justia… ALL THE WAY BACK IN 2008.

    Justia.com is the main resource on the web for all things related to United States Supreme Court holdings. And this may, in fact, be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. It’s the cover up that tends to bring down tyrants more often than not. These revisions did not happen – just prior to the 2008 election – by accident.

    THIS MUST BE INVESTIGATED. ” http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/the-express-lane-to-natural-born-clarity/#comment-18616

    That’s Leo’s response when he discovered a very blatant editing of the Pope case at Justia in July 2008, a crucial period, as you recall, for Barry. Birth announcements being rigged up and planted. COLB’s being created and planted. Now we have Supreme Court decisions being censored to remove and hide the EVIDENCE that Barry never was eligible for that job.

    Leo says this censoring is scary. It truly is. We’ve been scared about this tampering, scrubbing, and lying for over three years now. Red Alert is a good choice of words.

    • From Leo’s thread.
      Kevin J Says:
      July 1, 2011 at 8:07 PM
      Leo,
      I did get the screen-shots of Justia’s Boyd case but already it seems that Justia.com has corrected the problem you documented with their edits of the Pope case. In fact, this is also very curious there are three total references to Minor on the justia’s Pope page, one in the 1st paragraph of the syllabus and one about 2/3 the way down the article, but curiously the 3rd references mis-spells “Minor” as “Miner”. Was somebody in a rush maybe? Do a search for “Happersett” and you will find all three references. Meanwhile I have the Wayback Machine before/after-edit screen shots for both Pope and Boyd cases.
      Keep it coming!
      *****
      [Leo] ed. I have news for them… many people saw it and took screen grabs. It should also remain at the internet archive, but I have screenshots of everything. I have done my work for the 4th of July and am getting ready to have some fun… but Justia better know that this is not going away and I am on a mission as will the American people be after the 4th. Everything has been saved. – Leo

  16. BUSTED! Did you see that Justia is un-scrubbing as fast as they can? I saw “Loren” commenting there on the day this first broke. Must have tipped off his buds. Too bad. People KNOW. People saved screenshots, Justia. You are SO BUSTED. Sounds like part of a conspiracy, huh? Knowledge aforethought and all that? Hmmm. Party to a crime? Hmmm? Just askin’. I’m not a lawyer, you know. Got a long way to go to be as smart as Leo!

    • I was reading twitter notes there and didn’t see anything warning them; I also checked them out earlier today (Tim’s). Glad you caught it! Has Leo said information is reappearing? I assume he wrote a letter to them about his findings like he did with Fact Check. If I was a lawyer ..a decent, law abiding lawyer…I would be livid that they can’t be trusted. Their integrity and status is at stake in a situation like this. Lots of good will could go down the drain really fast if the lawyers talk…and you know they will spread the information.

  17. My comment to Leo Donofrio: (currently awaiting his moderation, but I wanted to share it here, too)

    Leo,

    MEMORANDUM April 3, 2009
    Subject Qualifications for the Office of President of the United States and Legal Challenges to the Eligibility of a Candidate
    From: Jack Maskell
    Legislative Attorney
    American Law Division
    This memorandum was prepared to enable distribution to more than one congressional office.

    I have downloaded that memo from scribd in PDF form, then run Optical Character Recognition (OCR) on them, and then uploaded it here:

    41131059-CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questions (with OCR)

    I think it’s worth noting that the Congressional Research Service memo mentioned you [Leo] twice, Wong Kim Ark nine times, and Minor v Happersett ZERO TIMES.

    It would appear that one of the reasons why references to the precedent in Minor were scrubbed was so that the Congressional Research Service could publish the following lie to members of Congress:

    The court thus implicitly adopted a meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” in the presidential eligibility clause which would include not only the narrow “common law” (based on apparent British common law) and the later United States constitutional designation for 14th Amendment purposes, that is, one born “in” the United States (jus soli), but also the statutory designation by Congress of one entitled to U.S. citizenship “at birth” or “by birth” transmitted from one’s parent or parents (jus sanguinis).

  18. I may be offline for several days (or I may still find a way to get online and pop in), so don’t worry if you don’t hear from me over the next week.

    • Have a great vacation..we all need one! Attend a July 4th Parade and indoctrinate your kids!

      • Thanks! :-)

        I indoctrinate my kids with the truth!
        (David Barton DVDs help tell them the truth that they won’t hear practically anywhere else)

      • Mega-dittoes, Red Pill. Be patriotic. Use those symbols. Socialize those kids into the TRUTH about this great Republic! Have a great time! Luv ya. btw, saw you on TV last night. The Devil’s Advocate. So cute!

  19. Notice how Justia has removed the case name, “Minor v. Happersett” from the citation in the case. They have actually re-written a Supreme Court case by leaving the case name out. I uploaded a current screenshot of the Justia Page for the BOYD case here. This is Orwellian in the extreme.

    This is actually frightening. And it is more proof than anyone needs to see that Minor v. Happersett is scaring the crap out of Obama supporters. These are United States Supreme Court cases being edited/revised to protect Obama.

    The history of these revisions is also documented at the Way Back Machine which contains a snapshot of the Pope case at Justia dating from November 13, 2006… and guess what – that snapshot contains the entire passage. Then on July 25, 2008, the Way Back machine shows that Justia.com edited the page for the Pope case again.

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/

    This is scary, but it’s also very encouraging. It confirms that Minor is precedent on the citizenship issue and that an attempt is being made to manage that precedent, marginalize it, erase it, ignore it and run cover for it. This is huge. This is traction.

  20. Rosemary Woodhouse

    But wait. There’s more.

    • dream act, ha, maybe we should call up Ed and let him weigh in on this!. Woa, getting close. It will be interesting to see the news after the holidays. A few new speeches on the Flotilla by Obama will be telling. And then this Dream Act stuff.

    • “They’re smart?” They’re also ILLEGAL.

      “They’re grounded?” ON THE WRONG GROUND! Their ground, for the most part, is Mexico. They should go protest on their ground and not ours.

    • Democrat Congressman Luis Gutierrez’s Oath to the Constitution was a sham! A fine representative from the bedrock of corruption.. Chicago, Illinois. A fine upstanding member of the PROGRESSIVE Caucus. He talks a good game and his game is the Marxist ideology not the Constitution that represents our nation and its laws.

      Before running for Alderman in 1986 Gutierrez served as an adviser to Chicago Mayor Harold Washington. Didn’t BHO honor that mayor also?
      * Chair of the Democratic Caucus Immigration Task Force
      * Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Immigration Task Force
      Is he also a member of La Raza?

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Luis_Guti%C3%A9rrez

    • “U.S. Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz accused the Republicans of trying to make it a crime to be an illegal immigrant. She sees a conspiracy. First Republicans want to say that illegal aliens are illegal, then next they’re going to want to take away their voting rights.”
      –comedian Argus Hamilton

  21. Leo,

    I “connect the dots” like this…

    By altering the historical record at Justia, it became possible to feed deceptive information to members of Congress.

    As I mentioned in a comment on July 3, the Congressional Research Service memo mentioned you by name twice, Wong Kim Ark nine times, and Minor v Happersett ZERO TIMES.

    It appears that the game plan was to bury Minor vs. Happersett, elevate Wong Kim Ark, and claim that being born a citizen under the 14th Amenment was sufficient for Obama to be considered a “natural born citizen”.

    Remember that Obama’s own “Fight the Smears” campaign web site initially claimed his Presidential eligibility was based on the 14th Amendment (“Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment”), but that was later scrubbed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s